Talk:LSm
LSm received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Thanks! I checked this page out. I will get more involved after I finish with the peer review. Promise! Bob Plaag 01:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC) (Constructive) comments will be greatly appreciated. I am leaving on a trip soon, so please don't be discouraged if I don't respond to them for a few weeks. Thanks. Bob Plaag 23:42, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
external links
[edit]This is a great article, but the external links don't seem so useful. The Pfam one and the LSm database one seem useful, but simply linking to NCBI or the top levels of SCOP and CATH don't seem so useful. Perhaps a link into the correct superfamily in SCOP and CATH would be better but might confuse the naive user. Alexbateman 12:06, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
SM (Sec Munc Like) Proteins
[edit]Seeing as this redirects from SM proteins is there any chance of adding something about this in? I'm referring to the proteins involved in the SNARE family (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Munc18 is an example). They are referenced in the following review (doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00091.2003 Am J Physiol Cell Physiol August 2003 vol. 285 no. 2 C237-C249 ) to give you an idea of what I'm getting at! sourcez (talk) 17:28, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
anti-Sm Antibody page
[edit]Is anyone else in favor of creating a separate page for the anti-Sm antibody? Having links regarding SLE-related disease directed to this page is confusing since this page does not discuss disease or pathogenesis. Alternatively, we could add a section on this page discussing the anti-Sm antibody in disease. Dryphi (talk) 03:16, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- I feel the same. Will work on it. DiptanshuTalk 03:45, 16 June 2013 (UTC)