Talk:LGI Homes

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 April 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Texas

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Arguments for inclusion of this page:

The page written is the fruition of web research on this particular company, and is written without any conflict of interest.

The builder is a large regional builder in Texas, and has been listed as one of the major home builders in the country by Builder Magazine, an independent sector-oriented magazine.

The article includes sources for all of its information, including third-party publications such as the Wall Street Journal and J. D. Powers and Associates.

Other private homebuilder pages, including Beazer Homes and Classic Homes have not endured speedy deletion, but rather have been allowed to adjust text to conform to any minor violation of guidelines.

These points made, I would be happy to have someone point out which elements of the page are considered unabashed promotion, and will be happy to edit those sections accordingly.

BizGooRoo (talk) 17:19, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on LGI Homes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110708104022/http://builderradio.com/blog/?p=17 to http://builderradio.com/blog/?p=17
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713203112/http://www.lgidevelopment.com/interlincMortgage.cfm to http://www.lgidevelopment.com/interlincMortgage.cfm
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.interlincmortgage.com/includes/aboutInterlinc.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:28, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Updates to this page

The content on the Wikipedia page in question is notably outdated. 2 months ago, I updated it with pertinent information after conducting thorough research over several hours prior to my posting. Upon revisiting the page after a two-months, I noticed that my revisions had been reversed, and I found myself accused of having a conflict of interest (COI). I would like to clarify that this is not the case, and, in accordance with Wikipedia's policy, it is typically assumed that contributors act in good faith. I kindly request that if there are specific elements of my edits that have raised concerns, they be openly discussed here for further evaluation.

Furthermore, it is essential to emphasize that Wikipedia's overarching mission is to accumulate well-researched and reliable information. In this context, it may be more constructive to retain the rigorously vetted portions of my contributions while removing any aspects that are deemed inaccurate or unverifiable. I wish to provide additional context by mentioning that I am a real estate blogger with a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter, which includes knowledge about the home builder in question and similar entities. Nonetheless, I would like to reaffirm that my involvement does not represent a conflict of interest.Tourdefrance57 (talk) 05:02, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]