Talk:LGBTQ rights in Uruguay

A news item involving LGBTQ rights in Uruguay was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 12 September 2009.

Wikipedia

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

Human rights Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Uruguay Mid‑importance

	Uruguay portal This article is part of WikiProject Uruguay, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Uruguayan society. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives.UruguayWikipedia:WikiProject UruguayTemplate:WikiProject UruguayUruguay
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on LGBT rights in Uruguay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on LGBT rights in Uruguay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:47, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong information on MSM blood donor status

Uruguay does not allow men who have sex with men to donate blood, unless there is a 12 month deferral, which is a "de facto" ban on sexually active gay males. It should not have a green checkmark on the summary table. This stance is held by the still applicable and enforced executive decree 385/000 and advocacy groups have been fighting it since at least 2012, gaining notoriety every few years of so. As of July 2019, men who answer yes to having had sex with other men during the preliminary questionnaire have their donations rejected.

Here's an article from 2016, newer than the cited source that supposedly confirms gay males can donate blood, which maintains it is still not allowed. https://www.elobservador.com.uy/nota/analizan-cambiar-norma-que-impide-donar-sangre-a-gays-2016710500

Updated article to reflect reality.

--167.57.172.42 (talk) 05:23, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT Uruguayans having the same rights as non-LGBT Uruguayans

I had a look at the summary table in this article and it seems that every LGBT right listed in the table had a checkmark (meaning that it was legal for LGBT people), except for commercial surrogacy for gay couples (that is banned for everyone in Uruguay). Should we change the title sentence to Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people in Uruguay enjoy the same rights as non-LGBT people? Easyfoodsniper (talk) 01:12, 29 July 2021 (UTC)easyfoodsniper[reply]