Talk:L'Arche

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Disability

L'Arche is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Improving this Article

On June 9/10, 2010, I introduced a number of significant changes to this article, paring down most of the original version and moving it to a new section entitled "History of L'Arche", then adding sections on the model, mission and character of L'Arche as a faith-based organization. As a Regional Coordinator currently with L'Arche in Canada, I am interested in engaging others around the world in helping me to improve the article even more in days to come.Njodonnell (talk) 12:41, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

they are all vegans .........

Confusion between L'Arche and the Arc

Both organizations, L'Arche and The Arc are large, national organizations which serve people with developmental disabilities. There is often some confusion that the two are related because of the similarity in names: L'Arche and The Arc. They are, however, not related. The Arc gets its name from the old acronym Association for Retarded Citizens or Association for Retarded Children.

Is it worth noting for a sentence or two that it is a separate agency from The Arc? --Pylon 16:26, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

I have removed most of the article, as it appears to have been a copyright violation from here: http://www.larche.org/charter-of-the-communities-of-l-arche.en-gb.43.3.content.htm . Let's rebuild the article using a variety sources and a neutral point of view. Kla'quot 07:15, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fiddy2

The suggestion has been made by [1] that this project is not of a financial magnitude to affect the International L'Arche organization. Deletion of the section has been proposed, and I welcome further views. Xcstar (talk) 19:13, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The suggestion that this is an important issue was raised by you, yourself. Your knowingly false and malicious edit on December 31 claimed the existence of a "controversy" with an edit summary noting that you "added reference to Fiddy2, an unfortunate episode in the L'Arche fundraising history". It seems extremely hypocritical to claim that the section be removed when it was you who inserted it here in the first place. Alansohn (talk) 19:18, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried to keep the name of the promoter out of this article, and you keep adding him back in. Contrary to your claim, I did not make the suggestion at [2] but having read it, believed that it would be more appropriately discussed here. The edit on December 31 merely reversed a prior deletion. A little civility on your part would go a long way. Certainly, the promoter's abuse of Wikipedia, has not help L'Arche's cause, and is in the words of that other editor, "annoying." I hope that you are not yet another in a long line of the promoter's sockpupets. Xcstar (talk) 22:01, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's hard to take your efforts seriously when you were the one who linked to Dane Rauschenberg in the first place with [this edit. Your edits have repeatedly deleted factual information from reliable sources, substituting it with false, misleading and defamatory information that violates WP:BLP. Removing his name doesn't resolve the problem you've created, as there are links that clearly reference Rauschenberg still included. You have still failed to show that there is any "controversy" or supposed issue with "tactics". The man has raised over $40,000 for L'Arche-Mobile and all you've done is maliciously imply that he committed fraud, was improperly supervised, paid for trips that shouldn't have been taken and "only" raised $43,000. If you cannot provide a reliable independent source that criticizes his efforts, your shameless and improperly sourced material will be removed as a WP:BLP violation. Alansohn (talk) 22:24, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So, critics?

Is there any critics of it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.200.164.47 (talk) 07:12, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Larcheboatname.jpeg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Larcheboatname.jpeg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:13, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on L'Arche. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:31, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on L'Arche. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:30, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The founder's personal relationships

@Orangemike: Hi orangemike, the information in the introduction is repeated later in the document. Plus, why is his personal relationships mentioned at the start of the organisation page? This should go on information "about the founder's personal life" or such. Referring to edit: oldid=1029257390 Jddcef (talk) 08:37, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Got rid of the banner

I'm pretty the bias has been ridden now. Timothy Aubin (talk) 01:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]