Talk:Kyabgön Phakchok Rinpoche
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Notability Questions
[edit]The subject certainly appears to be notable and there is possibly more subjects in the asian languages then there is in Enghlish. I published from WP:AFC this based on articles like [[1]]. I understand if other editors feel it doesn't meet the inclusion guidelines just wanted to explain why i did this. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 08:37, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi Hell in a Bucket. I have been working with this article to include references to show the notability of this subject for the past few months. Many thanks for adding this to wikipedia so that it is now searchable and findable. I notice at the top of the page it says there are multiple issues: it is an orphan page and it need additional citations and verification. Can you help me understand what additional citations would be required? There are multiple published sources referenced, articles and interviews linked, and multiple websites that feature his biographical information, showing he is in fact a well-regarding Buddhist teacher. Please advise. Changchubdawa (talk) 23:55, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Added additional citations and removed non-neutral language
[edit]Hello! Bilorv on a July 8 Help desk reply [2] noted that certain section of this page need additional citations, which I have added. In addition, a box was added noting my connection to the subject and warning against non-neutral language. I have since reviewed the Wiki policy and have removed any language that might be construed as non-neutral. On the history of this page I see that Orangemike added the box pointing to this policy. Would either of you please review the edits and remove the box if warranted? If not, please let me know what should be changed. Thanks! Changchubdawa (talk) 07:40, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Kyabgön Phakchok Rinpoche. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20140811182836/http://www.rangjung.com/authors/Phakchok_Rinpoche.htm to http://www.rangjung.com/authors/Phakchok_Rinpoche.htm
- Added archive https://archive.is/20140811182836/http://www.rangjung.com/authors/Phakchok_Rinpoche.htm to http://www.rangjung.com/authors/Phakchok_Rinpoche.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130830004233/http://cglf.org/projects to http://cglf.org/projects
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:18, 13 December 2017 (UTC)