Talk:Kursdorf

A fact from Kursdorf appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 November 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Kursdorf is "the loudest village in Germany" and a "sound inferno"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kursdorf.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 05:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Kursdorf is "the loudest village in Germany" and a "sound inferno"? Source: Der Tagesspiegel Sachsische Zeitung
- ALT0a: ... that Kursdorf has been called "the loudest village in Germany"? Source: Der Tagesspiegel Sachsische Zeitung
- ALT1:... that Kursdorf is located within Leipzig/Halle Airport? Source: Leipziger Volkszeitung etc
- ALT2:... that over 100 million euros was invested into soundproofing Kursdorf, but it was abandoned anyway? Source: Der Tagesspiegel for 100 million eur, LVZ for abandonment

Reviewed:
Comment: 4th nomination, so no QPQ

5x expanded by Eviolite (talk). Self-nominated at 03:35, 21 October 2021 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing: - There's a sentence in "Location" that is unsourced. Could that be solved?
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

Cited:
Interesting: - What I suggest is simply "... that Kursdorf has been called "the loudest village in Germany"?"

QPQ: None required.

Overall: JBchrch talk 14:40, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JBchrch: Removed the distances, added alt as 0a. Any opinions on if the alt hooks are interesting? Thanks, eviolite (talk) 15:27, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Eviolite: Thanks 👍 I thought ALT1 was the best one, but it needed some form of distance (=> "been called") because there are quote marks and it's a subjective judgements. ALT1 is not that interesting to me. ALT2 is somewhat interesting, but ALT0 is clearly the more punchy and catchy information. What do you think? JBchrch talk 15:39, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JBchrch: I agree, ALT0a and ALT2 are probably the most interesting, but I don't have an opinion between them. By the way, if things are all resolved could you give it the {{subst:DYKtick}} for the bot? Thanks! eviolite (talk) 15:47, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Eviolite: So shall we go with ALT0a? Yes of course I will give a tick I just want to make sure we agree on the hook 😊 JBchrch talk 15:50, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JBchrch: Yes, ALT0a is good. Thanks, eviolite (talk) 15:55, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright!

for ALT0a. JBchrch talk 16:01, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JBchrch: I'd rather promote ALT0, to be honest—any chance that would be approved also? It's fine if not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by theleekycauldron (talk • contribs)

@JBchrch: as you may have not received the above ping eviolite (talk) 11:33, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Eviolite and Theleekycauldron: Sorry had not received the ping. Leeky by all means do what you think is best. JBchrch talk 12:05, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ALT0 to T:DYK/P3