Talk:Kunsthalle

Re-definition

The present text does not meet the present state, nor the historical base. I have tried to fix it. --R.P.D. 01:53, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And I would opt for a chronological arrangement of the examples: It would make things easier, for then the historical aspect becomes transparent. --R.P.D. 02:22, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rating proposal in accordance to the WPMuseums criteria... Sorry, forgot to sign, --rpd (talk) 01:13, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the article is definitely not correct. There is a serious difference between Kunsthalle and Kunstverein, which neets two articles. Please check the german article "Kunstverein". --Artmax (talk) 07:37, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely right, this difference should be transparent (I would be happy with a separate entry, but as there are similar associations in other countries some checks are necessary be before acting). As far as the content is concerned, I think the present state is correct, especially if compared to previous versions. --rpd (talk) 19:50, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RogoPD, I hope I used the correct english terms (I am a german as you noticed). --Artmax (talk) 10:02, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would Tate Modern qualify as an english example of a Kunsthalle? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.149.166.87 (talk) 17:10, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]