Malaysia Low‑importance

	Malaysia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Initial hearings"

Untitled

"Initial hearings are scheduled to be heard on November 19–22, 2011." --> Who are they inviting to those so-called "hearings"? This whole article and organization seem to be without credibility. John Hyams (talk) 23:44, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I nominated this page for deletion because it seems to me that this organisation is not notable according to WP:ORG, nor it is legitimate according to international legal standards. John Hyams (talk) 00:00, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like they are symbolic, and are charging George Bush and Tony Blair in absentia ([1], [2] [3]).--kelapstick^(bainuu) 00:19, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After World War II there were many people who thought of war as something horrible that needed to be avoided at all costs. It appears Mahatir has been shaped by that. The new generation of Bush II, Cheney, and Blair are different. Symbolic is all people can get and better than tangible aggression from frustrations that new places of war and destruction pop up all the time. There was a tribunal of a symbolic nature in Denmark re the Vietnam War. Bush II, Cheney, and Blair must have a lot to hide or they could agree to be tried in The Hague and bank on coming out clean and clear. But they aren't confident about that so therefore a symbolic tribunal is better than none at all. 2001:8003:AC60:1400:38A2:C8F9:348:BCC0 (talk) 03:19, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Legitimacy of tribunal

This is a peculiar situation. There is no government behind this court? There was no governmental body behind the Nuremburg Trials either. The tribunals were ad hoc committees with representatives of several sovereign nations (victors in war--no representatives from the losers), set up just to prosecute officials of the losing side, for what were not crimes under German law. The Nuremburg tribunals made up procedures as they went along, made up new crimes never before prosecuted. Yet most people seem to accept the legitimacy of those decisions. Here we have a tribunal composed of respected judges and lawyers, yet not affiliated with a government (?). It has all the outward trappings of a court: hearing witnesses, considering fact, applying international law, and making decisions of guilt or innocence. But not having the power to impose a sentence? It seems more like a court of public opinion, a court to render a purely historical verdict. Yet-- Nuremburg was that, too. Justice Jackson, Chief Prosecutor, stated that one purpose and perhaps the main purpose since no punishment could fit the enormity of Nazi crimes, was to lay the facts before the court of history. To compile a detailed, cross-examined, absolutely reliable record of what happened so it could never be denied (some people have attempted to deny the Holocaust anyway, but that's a different matter). Being unsure what to make of this tribunal, I will simply note it, and wait to see how various international organizations treat it. ElijahBosley ^{(talk ☞)} 01:01, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here :

Universal jurisdiction or universality principle allows states or International organizations to claim criminal jurisdiction over an accused person regardless of where the alleged crime was committed, and regardless of the accused's nationality, country of residence, or any other relation with the prosecuting entity. Crimes prosecuted under Universal Jurisdiction are considered crimes against all, too serious to tolerate jurisdictional arbitrage.

Simply put: The Nazi's are never entitled to a Nazi trial. 84.106.26.81 (talk) 15:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The section on Legitimacy seems to be written for the purpose of undermining the commissions status. It may or may not be correct that it is a private organization, with no legal standing. But it may also be that it is a state-sponsored commission, with legal powers. Rather than speculating, and assuming it has not legitimacy, isn't it more helpful for a Malaysian editor to find this information?101.98.74.13 (talk) 08:37, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.newjerseynewsroom.com/international/are-george-w-bush-and-dick-cheney-war-criminals-malaysian-court-says-yes

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:59, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120101115154/http://www.cbsnews.com:80/8301-501712_162-57324770/symbolic-war-crimes-tribunal-to-try-bush-blair to http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501712_162-57324770/symbolic-war-crimes-tribunal-to-try-bush-blair/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:35, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:22, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]