Talk:Kshatriya Kulavantas

	India portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This redirect was last assessed in July 2021.

Shivaji material

Two or three times I have removed information from the article that is out-of-scope, about:

This material is too far away from the core topic of this article, which is specifically about the title itself (at least as I understand it; happy to be corrected). Other incidental or tangential information should really only be included if it helps to explain or shed light in some way on the Kshatriya Kulavantas title.

Dear IP user @113.199.255.210 - about the removed sentences, my apologies, but please see the above, and also note all the articles there are elsewhere on Shivaji -

Swarajya, decline of the Mughal empire, Shivaji prevailing over them, and the ongoing influence of that on the course of history, are all covered in other articles. For example, apart from the links above, there are:

articles which are either about Shivaji's life or his legacy. Surely with that wealth of material, it is not necessary to take over this Kshatriya Kulavantas page by "scope-creep" too? On the other hand, more (sourced) information about, for instance, how the royal title was arrived at, who thought of it, if it was based on previous tradition, and its later history, and so on, would be very useful to expand what is a tiny page at the moment. I am always happy to discuss. Thanks 49.177.6.159 (talk) 09:16, 18 September 2021 (UTC) Fix 49.177.107.107 (talk) 09:36, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way to convince editors here that it is not suitable to keep adding information that several different editors have removed more than once? And is really more suitable for caste pages, anyway? Why is it ok for @Kshatriya.History and, especially, @Historyvilla - who also calls people idiotic or is otherwise critical of them in edit summaries - to keep adding this stuff here, when there are so many other places with the information? We need more about this Kshatriya Kulavantas title for this page. Can't you help with that? AukusRuckus (talk) 12:58, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. Above was meant for the Hardauna talk page, but now it's here, it might as well stay. AukusRuckus (talk) 13:02, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, how may we resolve the edits & put the logical text on the page. It's true that Hardauna is kurmi majority village not only this its was a estate of 6 36 village, then why it was unfair to added their history in this page Hardauna. Historyvilla (talk) 03:25, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]