Talk:Kryptos (band)

Neutrality

Dj sal666 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

This user has filled the article with blatant WP:NPOV violations. I don't want to seem like an edit warrior, so I'd like some outside input on the case. I've warned Djsai666 about NPOV violations already. Zakhalesh (talk) 12:58, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. I had the same concerns earlier today about its current content and tagged the page with {{advertising}} but had not had the chance to investigate the history of it. DMacks (talk) 13:20, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Amrithraj (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Another editor has restored the POV. While I have my suspicions, I won't request any investigation, because any sockpuppet violation of editors these new is very likely to be ignorance, not malice. I'll drop a reminder to both of them to obey the neutral point of view and ask them to read WP:SOCK. Zakhalesh (talk) 15:38, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Durp. I must've misread the entire diff. Different edits with no vast promotional tone. Sorry! Zakhalesh (talk) 18:59, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kryptos (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:15, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]