Jump to content

Talk:Krohn Air

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleKrohn Air has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 4, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 18, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Krohn Air was started by a local businessman to continue servicing the route from Molde to Trondheim, Norway, after Scandinavian Airlines terminated its service?


GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Krohn Air/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 03:38, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 03:39, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    The article is reasonably well written and complies sufficiently with the MoS, I made a few minor copy-edits.[1]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    References look good, RS. Statements adequately sourced as far as I can tell with FoxLingo translate, no OR
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Sufficient detail
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Stable
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    THe logo has a suitable non-free use rationale
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Good to go, happy to list. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 03:58, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bankruptcy

[edit]

The article is partially updated for facts and tense, but the article now has a bare URL. Geschichte (talk) 19:53, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have formatted the bare url into a proper ref using the cite news template. Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 21:49, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]