Jump to content

Talk:Kristersson cabinet

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Kristersson Cabinet)

Proposed merge of Tidö Agreement into Kristersson Cabinet

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was do not merge. ~ lovkal (talk) 13:50, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This agreement will be the policy of the incoming government. The cabinet's article should be the place where its policy is detailed so that as much as possible is in one place. ~ lovkal (talk) 09:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose merging. Within a couple of hours, the Kristersson Cabinet will expand with government ministers, and so will the article. J 1982 (talk) 22:12, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose merging - No point in merging article. This is about an highly important political event in Sweden. It will certainly be expanded and improved as well.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:02, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose merging, for two reasons (while I do understand the argument for merging). a) While it is the foundation for the formation of the government, there are many aspects where the government will not be ruled by the Tidö Agreement. b) I think it would be a mistake to see the Tidö Agreement merely as a way to form government, given how it is an agreement on parliamentary action including a party which is not part of the government. /Julle (talk) 22:00, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - The document pertains substantially to matters outside of the work of the Kristersson Administration itself. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 22:05, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The agreement has been described as unprecedented by political commentators in Sweden. A brief description in Kristersson Cabinet would probably not be in-depth enough to describe the impact on Swedish politics. /Jiiimbooh » TALKCONTRIBS 07:58, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Since he's in the Cabinet, shouldn't somebody translate an article about him into English? Orange Mike | Talk 21:16, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:26, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 September 2023

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)MaterialWorks 12:20, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


– Per MOS:CAPITAL as these are not proper nouns. This is shown as the standard format used at similar articles such as Sunak ministry and Third Rutte cabinet, for example. estar8806 (talk) 04:42, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.