This article is written in Pakistani English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Asia, which aims to improve the quality and status of all South Asia-related articles. For more information, please visit the Project page.South AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject South AsiaTemplate:WikiProject South AsiaSouth Asia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
I just migrated this article to Template:Infobox ancient site and I was a little confused when I read it. What is confusing is that this article is about the Harappan 1 to Harappan 2 site, but the article only has photos of the much more recent fort, which already has its own article! Ideally, someone should get photos of the actual ruins of that ancient settlement and put those in the article to replace the fort photos. Also, I get the impression that Kot Diji is the name for both the modern town and the ancient site? Would be good to mention that in the article. Also note that I used the national map of Pakistan for the infobox, which is more recognizable than the map of Sindh in my opinion. --AlexanderVanLoon (talk) 10:10, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Adding to this - I think the photo is a misrepresentation. The fort pictured did not exist until the 16th century AD
