Talk:Kosciuszko Huts Association

This article was nominated for deletion on 15 October 2022. The result of the discussion was keep.

	Australia portal Kosciuszko Huts Association is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canberra (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Improve the general description of the KHA

The description of the KHA on the Australian National Library collection of their records is good: "The Kosciuszko Huts Association, formed in 1971, is an Australia-wide organisation which restores and maintains huts in the Kosciuszko and Namadgi National Parks for use by bushwalkers and skiers. The Association also undertakes research into the historic significance of the Parks' huts." (https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/1179535) Lijil (talk) 20:36, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Huts" needs explaining

An explanation of what these huts were for would be good. There is also no real attempt at explaining why they are of historical importance, other than that they are old, which in itself is not always significant. SpinningSpark 21:32, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]