This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
A fact from Kosala (novel) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 May 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
@Gog the Mild: Hi Gog. I hope, you are well and safe. I have been working on this article since long time. I want to expand it further, and make it GA. I am going to put a request for copy editing on GOCE. Before that, can you please help me in rearranging all the things. Ex. Which text should be kept in which section? Should we create new section for any particular things? No urgency. Thanks. --Gazal world (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Gazal world, I hope that you are keeping well. I am not an expert on literature articles, but so far as I can tell everything is in the correct place. It needs a copy edit, but to me it is ready for it. Gog the Mild (talk) 18:03, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It looks good. A couple of things that I would tweak, but that's just personal preference. You have received a very good copy edit from FiveFaintFootprints, better than I could have done. It looks more than ready for GAN to me. Gog the Mild (talk) 11:48, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
influenced by existential philosophy → already linked in the lead
Done (removed link)
Like other existential novels → same article (already linked)
Done (removed link)
exploring existentialist ideas such as an obsession with birth and death, dread, alienation, and absurdity → cite sources
I have added citation at the end of each paragraph which verifies whole paragraph. Should I place citation repeatedly in a single paragraph supported by the same citation? If you suggest so, I will do. But I don't see any point in repeating the citation multiple times in a same paragraph when whole paragraph is supported by the same citation. --Gazal world (talk) 17:17, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pandurang is estranged from his father, and has been from childhood. → cite sources
Done
the patriarchal value system characteristic of traditional Indian life.→ cite sources
Done
found anything meaningful in his experience of village life. → cite sources
Done
style, reading like a series of diary entries. → cite sources
Done
I have hidden the whole part (two sentences) from the article. This is the only unsourced part in the article. It was added by article creator. --Gazal world (talk) 18:58, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
serves as an instrument revealing his worldview. → cite sources
See above (hidden)
which ultimately uncover to them the absurdity and pathos of their condition → cite sources
See above (hidden)
including: autobiography, the diary, the novel, Indian folktales, folk narrative, and medieval hagiography. → cite sources
I have used a blog as a reference to prepare a list of translation/translators. I have verified that these translations are available in respective languages. Due to lack of any citation regarding this elsewhere, I have used a blog as a reference. I think this translation table would not require any high quality reference either so please consider this reference as an exception. --Gazal world (talk) 17:18, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@CAPTAIN MEDUSA: I have removed the blog from the reference, and have added primary sources (the translated books itself) in reference. Still there are three translations left without reference. If you tell me, I will hide them from the table. All other queries have been resolved. --Gazal world (talk) 16:50, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.