Talk:Komtar/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: PenangLion (talk · contribs) 04:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Praseodymium-141 (talk · contribs) 15:12, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! I'll be reviewing this article. ¹⁴¹ Pr -_\contribs/- 15:12, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: - Article seems to be stable, I don't see anything wrong with it.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Article looks good at a glance, I'll have a closer review in a bit. ¹⁴¹ Pr -_\contribs/- 15:18, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey...are there any further comments for this review? gavre (al. PenangLion) (talk) 14:47, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Praseodymium-141, I will be closing this review as you have not made any comments for over three weeks. I will be handing the process over to another editor who is interested in reviewing the article. Cheers, gavre (al. PenangLion) (talk) 04:08, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is some sandwiching going on in the construction section - there are just a lot of images in general. Consider removing some or grouping them together.