This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria
This article is within the scope of WikiProject North Macedonia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North Macedonia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North MacedoniaWikipedia:WikiProject North MacedoniaTemplate:WikiProject North MacedoniaNorth Macedonia
Why is the ethnicity of the revolutionaries from the IMRO, and in this case Seizov's one, important? The question is reasonable insofar as this is a controversial topic between Bulgaria and North Macedonia in the first place, and in the second place because a small part of these revolutionaries changed their identity and from Bulgarian it became Macedonian at a later stages after the dissolution of the organization in 1934. For this reason, the issue is noted in all articles concerning this category of persons on Wikipedia. I do not see why this should be avoided here, except for the usual denial of the Bulgarian affiliation of this group of revolutionaries, propagated in Yugoslav Macedonia since 1950s, which continues till today in the found in 1991 North Macedonia. Among other things, I notice that the articles created by User:Macodudewasalreadytaken? are in this dubious style, even attributing ethnic Macedonian identity to activists of the organization who never had such one. Wikipedia cannot reflect marginal views in the first place, ignoring or avoiding the historical facts. Jingiby (talk) 20:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
