Talk:Knight Kiplinger
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Rewrite suggestions
[edit]This really needs a total rewrite to make it encyclopedic and non-PR. A good first step would be to cut it back to who he is and what he has done, removing all his thoughts on life, the universe and everything. The references are a classic case of WP:Bombardment and a good many of the non-independent ones could go, too. JohnCD (talk) 23:22, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
The background and education part doesn't explain how somebody of prime draft age could drop out of a master's program and not end up conscripted and in Vietnam. Perhaps he got a safe lottery number, but this was THE big issue for a healthy male. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.49.20.187 (talk) 00:49, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Not a conservative or libertarian
[edit]This article really is bollocks. Especially this passage: "favoring individual responsibility, private philanthropy, a limited U.S. foreign policy, and minimal government intrusion in private personal interactions". In a recent article, Kiplinger proposed that every employer be required to have a 401K plan and that all employees be required to contribute 3% of their salary to the fund, with an equivalent 3% match from the employer, increasing to 6% from both as time passes. A philosophy far, far away from Libertarianism as you can possibly get. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.250.181.130 (talk • contribs) 16:16, 7 October 2013 (UTC)