Talk:Klosters

Population rate "Over the last 10 years the population has decreased at a rate of -2.8%" An increase of -2.8% is a population getting smaller, a decrease in population of 2.8% is a population getting smaller so "a decrease in population of -2.8%" is surely a population getting bigger? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.8.242.149 (talk) 15:07, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The municipality is Klosters-Serneus

Klosters is only a part of the municipality Klosters-Serneuns. The text here evidently is about Klosters-Serneuns and not only Klosters. The text therefore should be renamed. (Needs help of a sysop, as there is a redirect on Klosters-Serneus! DidiWeidmann (talk) 14:56, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. The term "Klosters-Serneus" is used only by bureaucrats. The towns are Klosters and Serneus (plus a few smaller villages and hamlets). I would personally have the bulk of this article on a page named "Klosters", retaining this page only to describe the dull technical aspects of the municipality and linking to pages "Klosters" and, if someone would write it, "Serneus". Of course, this might violate the approved structure - perhaps someone more experienced could advise? AndyI 16:21, 26 August 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aci20 (talk • contribs)

I think it is a little bit early for a move. The place is widely known as "Klosters" since long and I'm not sure that "Klosters-Serneus" is more than an official name. Naturally everone is free to start a RM. mgeo talk 12:07, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Klosters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:35, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Klosters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160802003536/http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/de/index/themen/17/02/blank/data/07/03.html to http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/de/index/themen/17/02/blank/data/07/03.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:06, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Minus

The "-2.43%" seems to be wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.178.127.55 (talk) 11:19, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]