Talk:Klenät
A fact from Klenät appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 November 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
cardamon?
[edit]My grandaunt's recipe for Klejner had cardamon in it. Is that an optional ingredient? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SimplyIrresistible (talk • contribs) 08:48, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- According to what is typically regarded as the "bible" of traditional Danish cooking, Ms Jensen's Cookbook (Frøken Jensens Kogebog), the ingredients for about 40 klejner are:
- • 1 egg
- • 60 g of sugar
- • the zest of one lemon
- • 75 g butter or margarine
- • 1/4 teaspoon of ammonium bicarbonate
- • 1/2 teaspoon of cardamom
- • 250 g of flour (read: "ordinary" wheat flour)
- • 1 tablespoon of cream
- So yes, the Danish version can fairly safely be assumed to include cardamom.
- PS. I'm referring to 6th or 2002 edition of this classic cookbook which was first published in 1901. It's one of two cookbooks found in pretty much every Danish home. The other is Good Food - Easy to Cook (God Mad - Let at Lave), sometimes known as "Havemand" after one of its original authors, Lotte Havemand. It's of more recent origin, being first published in 1973 by the Danish Association of Home Economics Teachers, today part of the Danish Diet & Nutrition Association (http://www.kost.dk/danish-diet-nutrition-association).
Merger proposal
[edit]I propose that Kleina be merged into Klenät. I think that the content in the Kleina article can easily be explained in the context of Klenät, and the Klenät article is small, so the inclusion of the material under Kleina will not cause any problems. It makes sense to have one single treatment of these Scandinavian pastries. If no serious objections are raised I will consider the merge uncontroversial and will carry it out in accordance with the directions at Wikipedia:Merging. Except (talk) 13:09, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
- I completely agree. Klenäter, klenor, kleinur, klejner, fattigmenn all seem to be the same dish and, bar the last, indeed the same word. They are all twisted rhomboids of fried dough using the same ingredients. It makes no sense to have separate articles for each of them.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Klenät. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20031109222612/http://www.milda.com:80/SE-New/dictionary.asp?cat=K&id=216905 to http://www.milda.com/SE-New/dictionary.asp?cat=K&id=216905
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:32, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Klenät. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110714102947/http://www.mixwell.com/recept.php?pageid=214 to http://www.mixwell.com/recept.php?pageid=214
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:42, 7 May 2017 (UTC)