Talk:Kitty Ussher

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Kittyussher (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Lancashire and Cumbria Low‑importance

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Buckinghamshire (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buckinghamshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BuckinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject BuckinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject BuckinghamshireBuckinghamshire articles

University of Oxford Low‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Photo

This page requires a photo Matthewfelgate 21:46, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Has one from her website - with her permission --Henrygb 00:54, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see your Commons talk page regarding this image. commons:User:pfctdayelise 01:42, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And now the photo is removed in a piece of institutional vandalism --Henrygb 23:32, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How the FUCK does anything get done on Wiki. Every time a decent change is made people come round and Remove/Delete/Reverse it. WTF is that all about?! Bring back the photo, it was good and it was legal. Matthewfelgate 22:24, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pls upload the photo again Henrygb. Matthewfelgate 17:58, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No point --Henrygb 00:08, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

the expense cotroversy section

There is to much unnecessary detail in the section, the stuff about artex ceilings, the section needs a more encyclopediac tidy, there are no illegal activities, so it reads like a tabloid attack. If there are no objection I will remove the excess detail and mellow it out. (Off2riorob (talk) 16:48, 18 June 2009 (UTC))[reply]

The artex ceilings claims is especially notable as it was a modification of the property which was unnecessary and down to personal taste - it's one of the most well known of her claims and certainly need to remain. The claims which forced her to resign are obviously more important, but the artex one is still needed.--Shakehandsman (talk) 23:16, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have to dissagree with you about the artex being notable at all. A lot of the outrage about mp expenses is just the press selling papers. The reasons she decided to resign are very relevent, the artex is not, the was a culture of this throughout parliament and the little details are newspaper fillers not encyclopedia entries.(Off2riorob (talk) 22:25, 21 June 2009 (UTC))[reply]

I have re-inserted the deleted paragraph about expenses. It is absurd to try to argue that one of the most significant MP stories that led to the biggest crisis in UK politics this generation is "just the press selling papers". Please stop deleting relevant and referenced material. Off2riorob, you have a largely Labour oriented edit history - it begins to look like you are attempting to play down this for party-political reasons, so give it a break. Fig (talk) 20:39, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks Fig, some excellent points.--Shakehandsman (talk) 17:46, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Father

I think her father was a lawyer or law lecturer, perhaps with a PhD, but not a medical doctor.22:19, 21 June 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.249.239 (talk)

Right Honourable

The article had her as having the title "The Right Honourable", which I've removed because she was never in the cabinet and doesn't appear on the Privy Council's list of members http://www.privy-council.org.uk/output/Page76.asp 87.80.97.137 (talk) 07:46, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kitty Ussher. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:30, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]