Talk:Kitman
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kitman redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2007-02-7 Automated pywikipediabot message
[edit]![]() | This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
--CopyToWiktionaryBot 05:27, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
The text about "political correctness" is just POV ramblings. Therefore i remove it.
2012-12-07 Completely Bogus Information
[edit]As a Shi'ite Muslim I can say that this information is completely bogus. Kitmaan is more of a loose philosophy than something clearly defined, it is different to Taqiyah. It in essence means to remain silent on that which is unnecessary/ not a necessity to mention, it doesn't imply lying; rather it is prudence - being wise and in some cases waiting for an appropriate time to be vocal on an issue. It also stems from piety, not saying something to offend someone and does not stem from slyness, cunning or politik, an example of which: if a pregnant wife asks her husband "Honey, do I look fat?" he may reply "You look beautiful to me my darling." (This is kitmaan) -- 22:27, 6 December 2012 105.236.78.254
- Among English-speakers, Czesław Miłosz's definition is almost as important as the original definition... AnonMoos (talk) 06:18, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Irrelevant, diversionary ending: "Nearly every clash of ideas,...in fifteenth-century Spain."
[edit]It may be true that "Nearly every clash of ideas, doctrines, and ideologies are accompanied by some form" of "secrecy, concealment". And it may be true also that there were "Nicodemite who were concealed Christians under the Roman Empire" or "Marranos in fifteenth-century Spain" who practiced "secrecy, concealment". Nevertheless, the alleged behavior of Christians and Marranos is not germane to topic of Islamic jurisprudence or its "science of deception or legal trickery". Likewise, the innuendo---arguably clever---that kitman is used by nonmuslims in "every clash" has no place here.
The offending passage, which is basically just diversionary, "tu quoque" rhetoric, needs to be deleted.
- Redirect-Class Islam-related pages
- NA-importance Islam-related pages
- WikiProject Islam articles
- Redirect-Class Religion pages
- NA-importance Religion pages
- WikiProject Religion articles
- Redirect-Class politics pages
- NA-importance politics pages
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Redirect-Class Philosophy pages
- NA-importance Philosophy pages
- Transwikied to Wiktionary