Talk:Killick Millard

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Death: Suicide Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Suicide task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Ian Dowbiggin

This person is hostile to voluntary euthanasia and for his views on Millard to form the whole article, as they do now, raises undue weight issues. For an example of Dowbiggin's views, we have "Dr. Dowbiggin makes the case that Canadians and Americans should not support the legalization of either assisted suicide or actual mercy-killing." [1] ► RATEL ◄ 10:15, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the use of Dowbiggin as a source. I strongly disagree with Dowbiggin, and there are a few things which I find concerning about his paper in the Journal of Contemporary History, but it is a reliable source for the history of the euthanasia movement in Britain. It cites research done by Nick Kemp for the book Merciful release, which I've used heavily in the history section of Dignity in Dying. There's nothing wrong with using Dowbiggin as a source for the history of euthanasia. His anti-euthanasia POV is not hidden and he doesn't seem to mangle the facts. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:12, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]