Talk:Kilburn tube station/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pkbwcgs (talk · contribs) 19:50, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to pick up the review of this tube station. It looks good and I will give a detailed review later. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:50, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to review Pkbwcgs! Though I will be busy these few weeks I’ll try to respond as quickly as I can :) Vincent^LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 00:11, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vincent60030: Your welcome. I like doing GAs on UK railways and the London Underground. I have my review table ready below. Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:08, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

@Pkbwcgs: any updates? Vincent^LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 17:58, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vincent60030: Hi. I am not very well but I will pick up the review soon when I am better. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:16, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man! @Pkbwcgs: do get well soon! Your health is more important than this. Everyone’s getting sick recently since it’s the festives so please take care Vincent^LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 16:26, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vincent60030: There are no disambiguation links, dead links or unsourced statements which is a good site. However, I am slightly disappointed that the second paragraph in the article is underlinked. In fact, it has no links. I would suggest that you put some links for the second paragraph to make navigation easier. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:02, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Pkbwcgs: Ok, done Vincent^LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 08:00, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vincent60030: I added one more important link to London Passenger Transport Board in the second paragraph. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:18, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Pkbwcgs: Are you expecting a reply for this? But anyway it has been more than a month so I was wondering if there are any updates you wanna give Vincent^LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 04:12, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vincent60030: Sorry, I have been quite busy. However, I have put on the first two passes. Pkbwcgs (talk) 11:33, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vincent60030: I would suggest changing the list below the Services sub-section into proper prose per WP:USEPROSE. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 22:06, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I beg to differ. It would look super weird writing in that way. Plus is not that long of a list anyway Vincent^LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 00:47, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 01:08, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vincent60030: Thanks for your continued patience. I would suggest that you convert the landmarks in the last sentence of the "location" section to blue links so that readers can click onto those links to find out more about the area near Kilburn Tube Station. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:50, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Pkbwcgs: Hello! Sorry for the late reply, been busy lately. I have added the wikilinks. I'm intrigued by your interests in wikilinks since I was expecting a bit of tweaks needed for the contents instead but seems like it is all good to you :) Vincent^LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 07:49, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vincent60030: I am going to pass this. Thanks for your work and your patience. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:20, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]