Talk:Kiehl's
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Reads like an advertisement.
Question
[edit]How is "Kiehl's" pronounced? Like "Kyle's"? or is it like "keels" rhyming with "heels"? 207.237.92.55 (talk) 07:08, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
I removed the "advertisement"-esque text
[edit]I removed the little Kiehl's catalogue of products and replaced it w/ a simple description of the range of products offered. --Paerra 04:21, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
It still seems very much like an advertisement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laj168 (talk • contribs) 00:10, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
- I think I've removed the peacock language, such as calling its products "premium" or mentioning how "its formulas utilize extensive herbal and pharmaceutical knowledge passed on through generations of manufacture". The article definitely needs independent sources though. -- Atama頭 22:22, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kiehl's. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090616214830/http://travel.nytimes.com/travel/guides/north-america/united-states/new-york/new-york-city/27575/kiehls/shopping-detail.html to http://travel.nytimes.com/travel/guides/north-america/united-states/new-york/new-york-city/27575/kiehls/shopping-detail.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100210061232/http://media.www.whartonjournal.com/media/storage/paper201/news/2006/04/10/Insider/Kiehls.Executive.Reveals.Secrets.Of.Guerrilla.Marketing.To.Fashion.Club-1802273.shtml to http://media.www.whartonjournal.com/media/storage/paper201/news/2006/04/10/Insider/Kiehls.Executive.Reveals.Secrets.Of.Guerrilla.Marketing.To.Fashion.Club-1802273.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:29, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
External link
[edit]An external link, named A Comprehensive Report | Products & FAQs 2020 - An Absolute Review!, in the references appears to be unassociated to the section. I'm not sure of its use and where it should be placed. It also has a promotional language to it. Feel free to move the link to where it should be placed accordingly. Thanks Chestsuva (talk) 11:23, 29 September 2020 (UTC)