Talk:Kiawah Island, South Carolina
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Update of History
[edit]I noticed there was a gap in the history section about Kiawah. I broadly covered from the Colonial period through the Civil War but as you can imagine there are not extensive sources on this topic. I found some great resources and covered what I could of this period of time, specifically regarding the Vanderhorst family. Elizsexton (talk) 18:32, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Notable Residents
[edit]How are these entries being substantiated? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.59.31.214 (talk) 02:56, 27 July 2009 (UTC) Removed this section until someone can A) substantiate the claims made and B) substantiate that some of these people are even noteworthy (looked up a couple on Wikipedia to no avail, still don't even know who those individuals are). Listed at time of removal were: Bernard Madoff; George Clooney; Bart Daniel; Michael Milkin; Clayton Adamy; Michelle Martinez; James Neale; Tommy Bilancione; Justin Zucarelli; Rev. Al Sharpton; Chris Vandivort; Zach Fisher; Michael Vick; Dan Marino. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.59.31.214 (talk) 03:00, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
"Family" beach and golf resort?
[edit]The word "family" has no clear meaning in this context. As discussed above, it appears to be a marketing term, inappropriate for Wikipedia.Fenwayguy (talk) 02:43, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Words and phrases like "hailed as" "spacious", "acclaimed", "sought after", seem like (self-)promotion to me and should be removed or changed to reflect neutral POV. I removed this sentence "Enjoy access to beautiful pools, tennis facilities, golf courses, fitness centers, social opportunities, and more." I'm a relative newbie. IAnne9853 (talk) 19:46, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Kiawah Island, South Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20160602200744/http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081007001450/http://golf.discoversouthcarolina.com/rankings/rankings-main.aspx to http://golf.discoversouthcarolina.com/rankings/rankings-main.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:09, 5 May 2017 (UTC)