Talk:Khosla Ka Ghosla

Khosla Ka Ghosla has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 8, 2019. (Reviewed version).

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 12 July 2019.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Khosla Ka Ghosla/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 17:34, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article. Thank you. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 17:35, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ssven2 A reminder since it has been almost a month now. Yashthepunisher (talk) 04:45, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll start posting comments tonight, Yash. Sorry I took up so much of time. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 08:28, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Is it Khurana or Khurrana? Be consistent with the name right throughout the article. I think its the first but its your call.
"Written by Jaideep Sahni, the film stars: Anupam Kher, Boman Irani Parvin Dabas, Vinay Pathak, Ranvir Shorey and Tara Sharma in the lead roles." — Remove the ":" and add a comma (",") after Boman Irani.
"and seek the help of Meghna's mentor, Bapu, to act as the owner of the land looking for a buyer." — Do mention that Bapu's a drama theatre troupe manager and owner and then mention subsequently about the theatre and the troupe afterwards for clarity's sake.
"growing up in middle-class Delhi" doesn't quite gel well with readers. Kinda vague. Maybe something like "growing up in a middle-class house in Delhi" or "growing up with a middle-class background in Delhi"?
"Banerjee said a real life experience when he Sahni witnessed their father being insulted by someone powerful helped them to develop the character of the antagonist Khurrana." — Is it Banerjee's father or Sahni's father or both their fathers? Do clearly specify.
"He also watched real footage captured using hidden camera's to understand how they behaved" — Isn't it "cameras" and not "camera's"?
"Kher said that he tried to boost the team's morale as the film was "made while enduring a lot"." — Enduring what?
Isn't it Meghna instead of Parvathy?
"Banerjee was initially reluctant to give Parvin Dabas the role of Chironjilal but later decided to do so" — Its Chiraunjilal right? and also why did he choose to give the role to him eventually? Any reason for that?
What other company did Hiremath have?

It's not mentioned in the source. Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:24, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"The film's small budget meant there were limited reels to shoot on two occasions." — You mean they "had limited reels" with them to shoot on two occasions right? Are those occasions mentioned by any chance?
Wikilink the publishers, websites and newspapers' names on the first instance they are mentioned (or) whenever they are mentioned.

That's about it from me, Yashthepunisher. I don't see any major issues with the release and reception and post release sections. Resolve the above comments and the article is passed. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 15:03, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ssven2 Your queries have been resolved. Thanks for reviewing the article. Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:24, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
Pass or Fail:

Thank you for addressing the above comments, Yashthepunisher. Congratulations, the article has passed. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 12:25, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Use of international numbering system in the plot section

Is it an standard practice? If we are using Indian dates and Indian English, I've a feeling that lakhs and crores should be used; besides I'm pretty sure the film uses lakhs and crores too. I can't find any relevant discussions or policy, I'll be very grateful if someone can point them out. TryKid (talk) 00:11, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]