Talk:Khoda (society)

Archives

POV dispute

The article currently sounds too much like an advertisement, brief though it is; particularly NPOV statements include "Khoda members hold characteristics of leadership, humility, and a responsibility to the betterment of Stevens as a whole as well as to the student community", "important issues," and "assures that there is a unified effort." Undoubtedly, including information from another source would help balance the article. Tjarrett (talk) 03:18, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"(N)POV" is not the correct term for what you are pointing out. Those examples are grandstanding, and the appropriate tag would have been {{unencyclopedic}} or {{tone}}. Also, hyperbole can't be balanced by "including information from another source." It can only be removed. So... just do it. :) -- Fullstop (talk) 17:39, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Khoda (God)

Hello, whats happend with the article about Khoda, the persian word for God? -- JCIV (talk) 12:28, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry, I see: Khuda -- JCIV (talk) 12:31, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:DICT policy. Please also see WP:V, WP:RS and WP:OR all of which also applied to the questionable content. -- Fullstop (talk) 16:23, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]