Talk:Khalji Revolution/GA2

GA Review

Passed. Kimikel (talk) 02:32, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Noorullah21 (talk · contribs) 22:20, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Kimikel (talk · contribs) 03:13, 16 July 2024 (UTC) @Noorullah21: Hello, I'm going to be taking over this review as part of the July GA backlog drive. I'll likely be done with my review within a few days.[reply]

@Noorullah21 Thank you for your very prompt responses. I've gone through and given the article a second look, and I see nothing left to address before this article hits GA quality. Congratulations and thank you for your work; this was one of the more interesting topics I've read about in a GA review thus far! Kimikel (talk) 02:31, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Noorullah21: Below is my initial review; this was an interesting read but has a few small issues to fix before GA status. Please see and consider the following suggestions, and if you have questions on any just let me know:

Well-written

I agree with the comment left by DeepstoneV. The Mamluks were Turkic; they did not originate from the country of Turkey. Therefore, the phrase "Turkic" should be used in place of "Turkish", even if the sources use the word "Turkish".

Fixed.

Lead

Replace "demise" with "death"
"Neglectful of governance," > A poor governor,

Background

"Muhammad of Ghor" > not wikilinked to Muhammad of Ghor, who does have a page
"the Mamluks rose to power" > how? when? doesn't have to be a whole paragraph, just a brief description of when and through what means they rose to power.
"rival Amirs" > rival amirs
"debauchery but"> debauchery, but
"Delaying his departure"> After he delayed his departure,
"secretly permitted by" > secretly permitted to do so by
"nobles, opposed to Jalaluddin's" > nobles opposed Jalaluddin's
"Qaiqabad, paralyzed under unknown circumstances, initiated" > Under unknown circumstances, Qaiqabad was paralyzed, initiating

Revolution

"nobles, with Jalaluddin at the top, whom they intended to put to death" > nobles which they intended to kill, with Jalaluddin at the top.
"Amirs" > amirs

Verifiable

Bibliography sources should be listed in chronological order, with the oldest first.
"A. L. Srivastava" should be listed as Srivastava, A.L.
The "Unesco" source seems to have the authors Asimov, Muhammad Seyfeydinovich, and Bosworth, Clifford Edmund: [1]

Spot check:

Chaurasia 2002, p. 28.: Verified
Mehta 1979, pp. 76–91.: Does mention Balban's ascent to the throne, but does not mention Balban strengthening the Delhi Sultanate within the pages listed.
Mahajan 2007, p. 121.: Verified
Bowman 2000, p. 267.: Verified
Asher & Hambly 1994.: Verified, although publish date should be changed to 21 November 2011 (its last update, according to the bottom of the article). Also add a retrieval date since it's a website

Broad

Issues with lack of background raised in first GA review have been addressed in my opinion; with limited knowledge on this subject, I was able to follow the events easily. Article is broad in coverage

Neutral

No issues with neutrality

Images

All appropriately licensed and benefit article

Stable

No issues with stability

Kimikel (talk) 23:05, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kimikel: Fixed all of the above. Noorullah (talk) 00:41, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.