Talk:Kevin Johnn
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
pov
[edit]The "Bio" section of this article is clogged with too many colorful, biasing terms. -- Mikeblas (talk) 16:03, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- That's because almost the whole thing is (most probably) a copy-paste from his now dead personal site. See this 2006 diff. -Yamanbaiia(free hugs!) 16:14, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- Indeed, it turns out to be copyvio from [1]. I've removed it, and straightened out more POV. -- Mikeblas (talk) 01:32, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Kevin Johnn/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Keep- I am Kevin Johnn's publicist, we are currently launching Kevin Johnn's new line called Kjeans and knits. |
Last edited at 17:42, 14 December 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 21:10, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Purge
[edit]To whom it may concern,
The article in deliberation is little more than the anecdotal musings of a dubious hobbyist.
The entry lasts no more than a few sentences, and what little biographic data exists is backed by not an iota of credence, or for that matter, verifiable accessible citations in any form, minuscule or extensive.
It is for this purpose that is stands to reason, therefore, that the article in question ought to be purged, and struck from the record, retroactively, and in ex post facto fashion.
With my most steadfast regards,
Undying Sikh 2601:204:C901:C730:E80F:87E4:DE93:F244 (talk) 10:05, 19 March 2022 (UTC)