Talk:Kevin Johnn

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep, 3 August 2016, see discussion.
Keep, 6 December 2007, see discussion.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

pov

The "Bio" section of this article is clogged with too many colorful, biasing terms. -- Mikeblas (talk) 16:03, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's because almost the whole thing is (most probably) a copy-paste from his now dead personal site. See this 2006 diff. -Yamanbaiia^{(free hugs!)} 16:14, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, it turns out to be copyvio from [1]. I've removed it, and straightened out more POV. -- Mikeblas (talk) 01:32, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Kevin Johnn/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Keep- I am Kevin Johnn's publicist, we are currently launching Kevin Johnn's new line called Kjeans and knits.

Last edited at 17:42, 14 December 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 21:10, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Purge

To whom it may concern,

The article in deliberation is little more than the anecdotal musings of a dubious hobbyist.

The entry lasts no more than a few sentences, and what little biographic data exists is backed by not an iota of credence, or for that matter, verifiable accessible citations in any form, minuscule or extensive.

It is for this purpose that is stands to reason, therefore, that the article in question ought to be purged, and struck from the record, retroactively, and in ex post facto fashion.

With my most steadfast regards,

Undying Sikh 2601:204:C901:C730:E80F:87E4:DE93:F244 (talk) 10:05, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]