Talk:Kevin Gage (actor)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kevin Gage (actor) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
STOP removing Verifiable, legally correct information from this Actor's update.
[edit]Additional info that is being removed - [redacted]
[ Redacted - No legal threats, per This policy ]
- Wikiblogg - to put this information on Wikipedia you simply must point to some reliable secondary source. A newspaper interview? Kevin Gage's own website? Otherwise, there would be nothing to stop me claiming to know (or even be) David Cameron and filling the article with details of his activities in Taxi's with tarts. And please don't start throwing around legal threats. (a) you'll get blocked, which won't help anyone, and (b) your lawyer will laugh. A lot. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:59, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Son with Kelly Preston
[edit]Why is there no mention of his son with Kelly Preston? 2601:8:9180:604:219:D1FF:FEA8:25F0 (talk) 21:33, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- Such personal information added to biography articles must be supported by reliable sources. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 20:33, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kevin Gage (actor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141011202041/http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=ebb81067f8e67730b1f3439b7bee8e5b to http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=ebb81067f8e67730b1f3439b7bee8e5b
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081020213959/http://safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=674 to http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=674
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:29, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
name policy, non notable offspring
[edit]Consider whether the inclusion of names of living private individuals who are not directly involved in an article's topic adds significant value.
The presumption in favor of privacy is strong in the case of family members of articles' subjects and other loosely involved, otherwise low-profile persons. The names of any immediate, former, or significant family members or any significant relationship of the subject of a BLP may be part of an article, if reliably sourced, subject to editorial discretion that such information is relevant to a reader's complete understanding of the subject.[f] However, names of family members who are not also notable public figures must be removed from an article if they are not properly sourced. Saintstephen000 (talk)