Talk:Kerne Bridge (River Wye crossing)

Kerne Bridge (River Wye crossing) was nominated as a Engineering and technology good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (February 16, 2022). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Herefordshire

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Herefordshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Herefordshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HerefordshireWikipedia:WikiProject HerefordshireTemplate:WikiProject HerefordshireHerefordshire
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kerne Bridge (River Wye crossing)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: SounderBruce (talk · contribs) 02:56, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Will review in a bit. Sounder Bruce 02:56, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Failed "good article" nomination

This article has failed its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of February 16, 2022, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Not written in an encyclopedic and neutral tone. Plenty of MOS issues, particularly with the use of hyphens instead of dashes, misplaced quotation marks, and inconsistent use of conversions.

2. Verifiable?: Unsourced paragraphs in several sections, including the entire "Today" section. The sources used are almost all unlinked (despite some being likely available online) and lacking in detail. The newspaper sources, for example, only list the paper and date of publication, missing the title, page number, and/or author.

3. Broad in coverage?: Far too much detail for events in the 19th century with comparatively little for the 20th century. The Toll section in particular is very guidebook-like. The lead is also far too short.

4. Neutral point of view?: See above.

5. Stable?:

Pass

6. Images?: Fine, but the captions need improvement.

The lack of appropriate sources is a major issue that needs to be fixed before attempting a second nomination.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— Sounder Bruce 00:33, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]