Talk:Keren Everett

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Women in Religion Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge

The topic warrants discussion, but there's nothing in this article at all that makes a case for separate and independent notability. This should be merged back in until enough information is present there to warrant a split. More importantly, this piece seems to be inaccurate, implying that the two are still married - Very much at odds with the parent article. Please update this or, if the other's wrong, both to cover the timeline of any possible remarriage. MrZaius^talk 17:59, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, the marriage info must be fixed. However she definitely deserves an article herself. Biographical articles are about one person only. --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 18:40, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with Jorge Stolfi. She is a key authority on a theoretically important language. --Keinstein (talk) 20:43, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]