Talk:Kentucky State Police

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Kentucky (assessed as Top-importance).

Law Enforcement Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Turtledove reference

You added this "The alternate-timeline historical fiction author Harry Turtledove has used a fictionalized Kentucky State Police as a plot device in his Timeline-191 series.", but your reference doesn't say anything about what you added. Do you have a reference that verifies your statement or is this just your opinion? 71.31.40.62 22:41, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

not my opinion, it's in his works. Chris 22:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does the reference you cited include this anywhere that it can be read? If not, the reference is worthless and therefore so is the inclusion. TenTech 03:13, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By that logic, you will need to reference and cite every sentence in this article. Also, mind your tone-"worthless" is not Wikilike. Chris 21:51, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By your logic, nothing needs to be referenced. Worthless is the opposite of useful. A statement you can't prove is not very useful, is it? TenTech 00:28, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Um, the opposite of useful with useless. A subtle distinction, perhaps, but one worth keeping in mind when conversations start to get tense. Binabik80 (talk) 18:22, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By your logic we need to reference the fact that shakespear wrote Romeo and Juliet

It can be read in Harry Turtledove's 'Timeline 191' books. I don't have a page number, but it's mentioned in both the American Empire and Settling Accounts series'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.203.49.189 (talk) 19:02, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:KentuckySP.jpg

Image:KentuckySP.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:54, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Kentucky State Police. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:44, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]