Talk:Kent Street, East Sussex
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Really?
[edit]Is there in fact any evidence that Kent Street really is a settlement? I can't find it on any map. There are a couple of streets called Kent Street, in and around Kent. But no village or neighbourhood appears.
The user who created this article has also created a number of others, and made changes to pre-existing ones, many of which have proved somewhat controversial, and it appears that he or she is writing from a gazetteer and is based in the USA. His talk page has a number of vandalism templates, and is short on responses to the charges levelled.
I'd therefore propose deleting this article — and will put the proposal up formally shortly, but it seemed wise to ask here on the talk page first, in case my maps are just rubbish! ;) – Kieran T (talk) 17:31, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Hmmm... there is something called "Kent Street" on the OS map at TQ783159; looks like a hamlet at most. It seems to be marked as a settlement on a larger scale map as well [1] though what it's official status is I don't know. Iain99Balderdash and piffle 17:57, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, thanks Iain, that's pretty clearly something, indeed! ;-) I'll leave it be, and hopefully somebody with a bit more knowledge of it will happen along. – Kieran T (talk) 19:07, 26 March 2008 (UTC)