Talk:Ken Davies

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 March 2009. The result of the discussion was keep.

Speedy tag

I'm not sure this should be deleted (certainly not speedied) as both entries meet MOS:DABRL and I think a merge with Kenneth Davis would be more appropriate than deletion, but I'd be interested to know what more experienced editors thought, as I'm not sure what should be done. Boleyn (talk) 22:47, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Right, it is not eligible for speedy deletion. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:30, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dabs aren't eligible for PROD either. I've contacted Jerzy, who's great with these kind of pages, and it would be good to find out what other people think, Boleyn (talk) 06:52, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen disambiguation pages deleted via PROD in the past, where the deletions are uncontroversial, although by a strict reading of Wikipedia:Proposed deletion perhaps they should not be (since disambiguation pages are not articles). The consensus about that is not clear. But for this page, I think it ought not to be deleted for the reason you said above: the entries meet MOS:DABRL. Also, I don't believe that merging to Kenneth Davis would improve navigability for readers. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 14:50, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]