Talk:Kemp Little

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 January 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

hello, just created this page, could anyone suggest how I can improve it regarding notability? I was thinking of including a section about the founder Richard Kemp who is notable within TMT law, but I wasn't sure if that would improve the article or just distract things DRosin (talk) 21:39, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The best way to demonstrate notability is always to produce "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" (see the general notability guideline). I reckon the references you've added already, especially those from The Lawyer and Legal Week, and the 'award' from the FT, succeed in doing that; as a result the article is probably safe from deletion.

A short mention of Kemp with a link to his article is appropriate, but you're right that adding too much would probably distract from the article's main topic. Olaf Davis (talk) 22:58, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]