Talk:Kellogg's/Archives/2015
Appearance
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Proposed merge with Austin (brand)
Insufficient coverage in reliable sources for enough content to constitute a standalone article (WP:CORPDEPTH). Ibadibam (talk) 23:55, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- I think the Austin (brand) article is too short to even be a section of the Kellog's article. Perhaps we could write a little bit more about the subject after it's merged? There's got to be a couple paragraphs worth of Wikipedia content in that company. Thatguytestw 23:43, 3 February 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thatguytestw (talk • contribs)