Jump to content

Talk:Kellen Winslow II

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Any update on Kellen's status? Can he return?

Get a better picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:241:8600:2303:F155:EF7E:E6E5:406D (talk) 15:19, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Winslow letter of apology

[edit]

Two things about the letter of apology from Winslow. First, for the anon user who entered the entire thing, that is not encyclopedic or appropriate for an encyclopedic article. Referencing that he did apologize, and maybe his most important point in the letter, is sufficient. I have revised this to approach it this way. However, the apology itself that you initially entered in its entirety needs to be referenced by footnote. I could not find the entire letter, so providng a link to it, following that section, is most appropriate. Thanks. MiamiDolphins3 05:22, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Soldier Tirade

[edit]

I've re-added the "Soldier Tirade" section after User:Charger81 yanked the entire portion with the reasoning of "removing speculative content of matters unrelated to football". First, the incident was *not* speculative. It occurred in a video recorded post game interview and made national sports headlines, dominating highlight reels that day. It is also directly related to football, having occurred in the locker room after the game in question. But irrespective of whether it has anything to do with football or not, it is an incident of interest pertaining to Winslow that earned him a great deal of notoriety. Wikipedia is comprehensive and inclusive of a public figure's (in this case is a football player) entire life that are of public interest ... not just a bio of his career history and stats. I would not have discovered the source of this tirade had I tried to look it up after this edit.eYeDEF (talk) 15:08, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kellen Winslow II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:43, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kellen Winslow II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:54, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rape case

[edit]

I noticed that the rape case was mentioned twice on Anthony Smith’s Wikipedia page. It’s mentioned in the beginning and then under personal life. It’s already mentioned in detail under personal life so I don’t think it’s necessary to put he was convicted of rape in the beginning of the page. Personally, it sounds redundant to me but I wanted to get others opinions before I did anything. Dreamerintheclouds (talk) 19:09, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per MOS:LEAD, the lead is a preview for the rest of the article, so will naturally repeat certain facts. Are you saying it's not a major point of his life to put in the lead?—Bagumba (talk) 01:30, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]