Jump to content

Talk:Kekhashru Mistry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk22:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kekhashru Mistry (1911)
Kekhashru Mistry (1911)

Created by Ktin (talk). Self-nominated at 22:50, 30 November 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • checkY Article is long enough (3375 characters), new enough (moved to mainspace 20 November, nominated same day), and article is within policy
  • checkY Hook is short enough, interesting, in the article and well cited. I added link to aide-de-camp in hook, as not everyone will know what this is
  • checkY Image is freely licenced (out of copyright in US and country of origin- I added PD UK tag to image), in the article and looks good at low resolution
  • ☒N QPQ not yet done. Ktin please provide a QPQ for this nomination
  • Overall, article is fine but QPQ is required. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:48, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Joseph2302: Thanks for the review. QPQ is now completed and has been updated. Please have a look. Ktin (talk) 15:42, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
checkY QPQ done
Good to go now that QPQ has been done. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:19, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Joseph2302, much appreciated. To the promoting admin / prep-builder, please promote this one with the image included. Happy to wait until a prep opens-up with an image slot available. Ktin (talk) 16:21, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To T:DYK/P7 without image

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Kekhashru Mistry/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 16:19, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 16:19, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image is suitably tagged.

  • What makes thecricketcauldron.com reliable? It appears to be a blog.

That's the only issue. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 16:32, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]