Jump to content

Talk:Kek Lok Si/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Muffin Wizard (talk · contribs) 11:18, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


I will do a review on this article as soon as possible, but please be patient. :)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Good.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    All references used are reliable sources, seems fine.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Good.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Seems neutral.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Seems fine, I see no edit war.
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    I see all images are available freely to use.
  7. Overall: After a frequent more check to the article, I see there is no more problem, so I give it a passed, thanks for all your time to work on this article. :)
    Pass/Fail: