Talk:Keighley & Worth Valley Railway

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

Yorkshire Mid‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Keighley & Worth Valley Railway is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Museums

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Keighley and Worth Valley Railway.

Ref confusion

There are two different refs with the same name. These are:

<ref name="P&P Spring 2011">{{cite news|publisher=Push and Pull|date=2010-12-01|title=Locomotive Notes}}</ref>
<ref name="P&P Spring 2011">{{cite news|publisher=Push and Pull|date=2010-12-01|title=Standard '4' Locomotive Preservation Society}}</ref>

The effect of this is that they are combined, with the text of the second one ignored. Worse, there are a number of uses of <ref name="P&P Spring 2011" /> which also become combined - it is therefore unclear which of these refer to the article "Locomotive Notes", and which to "Standard '4' Locomotive Preservation Society". --Redrose64 (talk) 22:13, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yanks

Why no mention of the 1979 film 'Yanks', starring no less than Richard Gere? The Americans are seen boarding a train at Keighley at zero notice hauled by the USA S160 on their way to 'D day'. The WikiPage for the film cross-mentions Keighley station. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.81.73.242 (talk) 20:58, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is it significant to the plot that Keighley was used, or could another preserved station have been used without affecting the story? More importantly, has the use of Keighley been noted by reliable third-party sources? --Redrose64 (talk) 21:25, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well I suppose just about anybody who has ever seen the film, and upwards of 500 actors and extras could vouch for it being Keighley. It's not just a 'sideshot' - the entire D-day embarkation scene at the end was filmed there, and it's undeniably Keighley 5.81.72.160 (talk) 14:04, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's significant to the history of UK rail preservation, because it's a rare event for a D-day film to be filmed anywhere other than the Bluebell.

Historically I expect this to have been an anageoism(sic): AFAIK no D-day reserve troops were billeted in Yorkshire, they were packed like sardines in the South. This has led to the predominance of the Bluebell (and the Watercress) for filming WWII military scenes, even over that other popular film location, the Nene Valley. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:21, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, my statement was simply that 'the end sequence of the film 'Yanks' was filmed at Keighley station'. Where Richard Gere and the other GIs got on the train, and half of the local female population turned up on the footbridge either pregnant or holding the resulting babies. I wasn't expecting to start a WikiAnalNerd debate about World War 2. Just watch the damned film. That scene was filmed at Keighley. No debate, no 'citation required', it just WAS. As for 'no US troops being billeted in the North', that is just pure ignorance. Patton's fictitious deceptive FUSAG with its inflatable rubber tanks was based in the South-East, but the real invasion troops were actually based in the North and in SW England. I am from Warrington, right next to RAF Burtonwood. Warrington was an American town in 1942-43, and remained so throughout most of the cold war too.5.81.72.160 (talk) 21:10, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Keighley & Worth Valley Railway/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.

~~Requires infobox~~ Done
Requires addition of inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates - Many added, more required MR7526 (talk) 15:55, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Requires updating as some items need switching to past tense now
Copy edit for WP:MOS

Keith D (talk) 13:16, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 15:55, 16 April 2011 (UTC). Substituted at 21:02, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Keighley and Worth Valley Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151220222738/http://www.royal.gov.uk/ to http://www.royal.gov.uk

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:36, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Keighley and Worth Valley Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304194603/http://www.heritagerailway.co.uk/news/volunteers-remember-50th-anniversary-of-worth-valley-closure- to http://www.heritagerailway.co.uk/news/volunteers-remember-50th-anniversary-of-worth-valley-closure-

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:03, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]