Jump to content

Talk:Katinka Heyns

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): FiveOfFive. Peer reviewers: Raoul.duke, Wildwest04.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Raoul.duke peer edit notes

[edit]

A few corrections are necessary to achieve “Perfect Article” status. First, the introductory section should be beefed up to give more of a “hook” that summarizes the filmmaker as well as confirms her notability. For example, highlight the films for which she is known as an actress as well. I re-ordered the sections in the approved category order, with the right category names—“Personal Life” changed to “Biography.” It is also missing a “filmography” section. I included a few more wikilinks. If you think of any others, then add them. If possible, try and include material from a few more sources and possibly a photo would be ideal. In Overall, the tone was good, with mostly non-promotional language used throughout. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raoul.duke (talkcontribs) 22:02, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

[edit]

The article is well researched and uses scholarly noteworthy sources. The author has written an article that is informative while also impartial. However, it would be better if the author edited the Awards and Nominations section to have the film maker's awards presented in bullet points or table format and not in essay format as it is now in order to make that section more succinct.The article would benefit from a clearly defined filmography section where the film makers different credits according to the roles she had are clearly stated. Further editing also needs to be done to ensure that the word flow in the article is as best as it can be. Wildwest04 (talk) 03:09, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]