Talk:Katie Pavlich

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

United States: Arizona Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Her background

What her family past. Are they middle class? Wealthy? Where did her family get their wealth? (Dad's job if he was a CEO or big time attorney, etc.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.176.7.248 (talk) 14:38, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting questions but may not fit into a Wikipedia article. I often learn more about a person by reading TALK pages -- the answers to those questions may be more appropriate here on the DISCUSSION page. Why don't you do a Google-search and get back to us. -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 11:05, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Finding Katie Pavlich

There is a current and updated bio for Katie Pavlich on the FoxNews website[1]:

"Katie Pavlich joined FOX News Channel (FNC) in 2013 and currently serves as a rotating panelist on FNC’s Outnumbered (weekdays 12-1PM/ET) and as a network contributor, providing political analysis and commentary across FNC’s daytime and primetime programming. On Outnumbered, Pavlich is part of an ensemble featuring four female panelists and one rotating male that tackles top headlines from all angles and perspectives. In addition to her role at FNC, Pavlich is the news editor for Townhall.com, a contributing editor to Townhall Magazine and the award-winning author of the New York Times best seller "Fast and Furious: Barack Obama’s Bloodiest Scandal and Its Shameless Cover-Up.” As a reporter, she has covered topics ranging from White House scandals and the 2012 presidential election, to the Second Amendment and border issues. She graduated with a B.A. in broadcast journalism from the University of Arizona and is a National Review Washington Fellow."

Since I am new to this excellent Wikipedia page/article, I'll read through and see what can be updated here. For example, I did not see mentioned the "Outnumbered panel". -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 11:14, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw here on the Sean Hannity show (one of three talking about the Second Amendment and Obama's executive order on guns.) -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 03:26, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adding a portrait-photo

A portrait-photo or an action picture always enhances a Wikipedia article. There is probably one available somewhere that we can use. -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 05:06, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You could ask her on Twitter; she's pretty active on there. Dick Laurent (talk) 22:50, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- Tnks, looks good! -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 02:56, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New NEWS today, for future editing

Katie Pavlich is on the rise. Headline-1: And the 2014 Woman of the Year Award Goes to….

http://townhall.com/columnists/rachelwilliams/2014/07/11/and-the-2014-woman-of-the-year-award-goes-to-n1861185

QUOTE: "Yesterday, the Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute honored Townhall.com News Editor Katie Pavlich as the 2014 Woman of the Year. The Institute was founded in 1993 to help organize and prepare conservative women for leadership." -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 18:37, 11 July 2014 (UTC) -- PS: FYI for future editing.[reply]

Done -- Tnks, Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 03:00, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting your falsehoods repeated by the President of the USA is notable

It was covered by RS. I fail to see how it could not be construed as WP:DUE, Snooganssnoogans (talk) 01:50, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I just want you to read what you put: "In August 2017, Pavlich was retweeted by President Trump...". There's the problem. This is literally a twitter retweet and that's not inherently notable. In fact, this entire thing is grasping at straws: no, he didn't pardon them, he commuted them - but both of these are forms of executive clemency. Half the article you cite, while noting her remark was not technically correct, points out there's not a huge difference between the two. A twitter controversy over the president retweeting something is not remotely relevant to her article and to argue it is is frankly absurd, and the extent of the post here is "she said pardon when it's really clemency". Nobody cares about that and nobody will care about this in 10 years. Toa Nidhiki05 02:28, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]