The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Katie Hopkins was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article was nominated for deletion on 15 July 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article was nominated for deletion on 4 July 2013. The result of the discussion was keep, again.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article was copy edited by Cricketgirl, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 6 September 2007.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
Not done: Wikipedia does not publish the opinions of its editors. The label is based on reporting in reliable sources, many of which are provided in the inline citation right after the label. Actualcpscm (talk) 11:06, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It’s a bit of a circular argument though - most of those sources label her ‘far right’ with no obvious supporting evidence. The others refer to her ban from twitter, which again don’t show any obvious objective evidence that she conforms to a recognised definition of ‘far right’. 2A02:C7C:86D7:6800:C22:4EDE:143F:3C3B (talk) 17:36, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 3 June 2024
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
I request the removal of the wording ‘Far Right’ to just political and social commentator when describing Katie Hopkins, as this term has tremendously strong connotations of extremism and fascism which would put Ms Hopkins along the same lines as mass murders such as the likes of Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin, this can be construed as character deformation.
I also have noticed that there is another example of something that can be connoted as bias and needs to be changed with the photograph you chose to represent Katie Hopkins, as instead of using a photograph from a professional photoshoot like most Wikipedia pages, the person who made this chose a photograph of Ms Hopkins while she was on a podcast in the middle of speaking, you should change this to a more appropriate and flattering photograph taken by a professional photographer in the years 2008-2015.
Please take action on these two issues immediately.
Not done Reliable sources -- many of them -- ID Hopkins as far right. This is well-cited in the article. So no. If you are unhappy with "far right" it seems your beef is with Hopkins' career choice rather than with Wikipedia. -- M.boli (talk) 16:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It’s a bit of a circular argument though - most of those sources label her ‘far right’ with no obvious supporting evidence. The others refer to her ban from twitter, which again don’t show any obvious objective evidence that she conforms to a recognised definition of ‘far right’. 149.241.121.18 (talk) 10:41, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Forbes labels her as "Far-Right" here. It says: "Hopkins was fired from her job at LBC, and reported to the police, after using Nazi rhetoric in calling for the “final solution” in a tweet after the 2017 Manchester Arena bombing." That's not "obvious supporting evidence"? Martinevans123 (talk) 07:10, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's the five WP:RS sources in the first sentence of the article that label her "far right". Wikipedia just reports what those sources say. If you don't understand that's the way this project works, I'm not really sure Wikipedia would want your imaginary donation. If you think this is all "wokery", I guess that's your problem. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:14, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for pointing out the subjective articles calling her ‘far-right’. Once again people believe the main stream media propaganda, who can say whatever they like without any accountability. If they said the Earth was flat would you put that into the Earth’s Wikipedia page? 2A00:23C8:9F80:F501:5D94:CBF2:F185:BCD8 (talk) 06:19, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
Not done: Wikipedia does not publish the opinions of its editors. The label is based on reporting in reliable sources, many of which are provided in the inline citation right after the label. Actualcpscm (talk) 11:06, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Not done Reliable sources -- many of them -- ID Hopkins as far right. This is well-cited in the article. So no. If you are unhappy with "far right" it seems your beef is with Hopkins' career choice rather than with Wikipedia. -- M.boli (talk) 16:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
