Talk:Katie Armiger

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep, 30 August 2007, see discussion.
Keep, 6 August 2007, see discussion.

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This is definitely a worthy article of Wikipedia. She is a big buzz where I live locally, in Houston, and is getting lots of play time on the radio all over the country. Please stop deleting this page, she is an important singer who will more than likely soon hit it big.

I feel it's a little different than the average "up-and-comer" because of her full record-company support, critical acclaim, etc. Please let me know what I can do to save the article - or is it simply a matter of the subject?

Provide verifiable references to reliable sources to demonstrate that she meets the notability guidelines for musicians. Also note that you are free to make your case on the AfD discussion page.

Forgive us more experienced editors if we're a little jaded about seeing terms like "aspiring" and "up and coming" in articles--words like that scream "not notable yet", which in turn means "not notable". --Finngall ^talk 21:19, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Katie Armiger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070811172925/http://www.omgnashville.com/comments.htm to http://www.omgnashville.com/comments.htm
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.wqdr.net/misc14284.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:08, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]