Talk:Katherine Tudor (1503)

	Biography portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Mid-importance).

English Royalty Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject English Royalty. For more information, visit the project page.English RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject English RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject English RoyaltyEnglish royalty
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Could this article be merged with one of her parents? As she only lived for one day, there is not much information for this article to contain. - Triviaa 17:11, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think this makes sense. Also, her parents' pages contain pretty much all the information on this page already. -Mrabbits 20:57, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How about just redirecting to Elizabeth of York? The interesting information here is really about her mother anyway, and is already contained in that article. Will do this soon if no-one objects. - Mrabbits 06:53, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But why? All her siblings have their own articles and making this a redirect would brake this pattern? User:Dimadick

All of her siblings lived long enough to have information to include in their own articles. Everything in the Katherine Tudor article is included in the articles for her parents, and there is nothing else to be added here. - Triviaa 16:20, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Which makes it a perfect stub. I have yet to find a reason for deletion. User:Dimadick

It could be argued the article shouldn't even be marked as a stub, since it's not that likely that it'll ever be expanded.

Anyway, it doesn't look like there's consensus to merge, so I guess we could just leave it as it is unless anyone feels particularly strongly about it. - Mrabbits 19:52, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

yes, but I have just added info, so obviously there was more info to add. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.56.64.93 (talk) 16:14, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

she lived for eight days not one — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.148.135.212 (talk) 20:03, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling

Is her name Katherine or Catherine? If it's spelled with a "C" the page needs to be moved to the appropriate article title. - Triviaa 14:50, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neither. The usual way to spell it then would have been Kateryn, Katheryn or Katharine, certainly not with a C. However, modern historians tend to use Catherine or Katherine, because these are the modern spellings. As people in the sixteenth century would spell their own name several different ways, there wouldn't have been one definite spelling for this child's name. It's fine as it stands, Boleyn (talk) 16:24, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]