Jump to content

Talk:Kate Fleming

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled

[edit]

Ms. Fleming died Thursday, December 14, 2006:

http://seattlepi.com/local/296094_fleming15ww.html

Name

[edit]

I have yet to find any citation to warrant the use of Kathryn "Kate" Fleming vs. Kate Fleming. In fact, the LOC Name Authority record for Ms. Fleming is Kate Fleming:

http://authorities.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?GetAuthRecs=1&SEQ=20061219090530&PID=2430

Is there another source for her name? ChartreuseLight 14:19, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kathryn is the name that was first reported to the media. See these Google news links. --Chris S. 15:18, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you; Her full name (Kathryn) has been confirmed in her obituary.ChartreuseLight 23:10, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 15:46, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Kate Fleming. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:17, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kate Fleming. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:26, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Kate Fleming. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:19, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Citation Farm

[edit]

I suggest we get rid of the citation farm (six references) used for this sentence: "She is survived by her wife and partner of nine years, Charlene Strong." This seems like a straightforward assertion of fact, and probably any one of the six references would be sufficient. Disclaimer: I have not read any of the references.

I came to the article as a reader, and I find those citations distracting. They call attention to themselves, suggesting there is some reason to doubt the statement is true, using the citation farm to settle it. If there is a meaningful dispute about whether or not the statement is true, then we should mention the credible sources that dispute it rather than use a citation farm to take one side of the dispute. Is there a credible dispute of the veracity of the statement?

I know we have talked about policies of how to treat these citation farms, but I forget where that is handled.

If I come back in the future and see that no one has responded and objected to my suggestion, I will go ahead and do something to prune those citations down to one or at most two. One or two references seems plenty IMHO.

--David Tornheim (talk) 15:06, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kate Fleming. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:04, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kate_Fleming&oldid=1207247205"