Talk:Kataragama temple

Kataragama temple has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 20, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

Buddhism Mid‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hinduism Mid‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sri Lanka High‑importance

	Sri Lanka portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sri Lanka, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sri Lanka on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sri LankaWikipedia:WikiProject Sri LankaTemplate:WikiProject Sri LankaSri Lanka
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

File:Murugan dunai.gif Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Murugan dunai.gif, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:46, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Very old accepted Publication by Sir Ponnambalam Arunachalam

Sir Ponnambalam Arunachalam published an article in Journal of the Ceylon Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society The Worship of Muruka or Skanda (The Kataragama God)(Vol. XXIX, No. 77) in 1924 is considered as the very old accepted publication about the history of Kataragama Temple. This sources is clearly mentioning how the name Kârttikeya Grâma (“City of Kârttikeya”) have changed to Kataragama.

Kataragama is sacred to the God Kârttikeya, from whom it was called Kârttikeya Grâma (“City of Kârttikeya”) shortened to Kajara-gama and then to Kataragama.

And also the source addressing how the name Kanda Kumâra changed to Skanda kumara.

Name of Load Kanda Kumâra (Kanda being the Tamil form of Sanskrit Skanda and Kumâra meaning youth).

Based on the Wikipedia:Five_pillars fundamental principles by which Wikipedia operates, this article needs to summarize in neutral way. So I avoid advocacy and characterize information based on the verifiable accuracy. Hence, before change the content that already have enough verifiable information, please discuss in talk page.
Shayanthan Kanaganayagham (talk) 02:42, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Shayanthan, for a newbie you seem to know about Wikipedia a lot :) But Ponnabalam Arunachalam is no historian or a an etymologist. He is a politicians that too a nationalist politicians. Can we leave this good article to accredited historians and researchers than "history makers". Thanks Kanatonian (talk) 15:30, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Its OK. Thank you for you information. Shayanthan Kanaganayagham (talk) 08:19, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added it under History section. Also read WP:LEAD, most of what is in the Lead is cited in the main article. This passed Good Article status, which mean akll the basic issues with respect to citation and verificatiosn have been done. Thanks Kanatonian (talk) 14:38, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kataragama temple. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110629044948/http://www.dailynews.lk/2009/07/31/fea25.asp to http://www.dailynews.lk/2009/07/31/fea25.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:00, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]